11 Examples of how Democrats, wittingly or unwittingly, advance the goals of the the Nazis agenda.
1. Many Palestinians want Jews dead. Democrats support Palestinians over Israel 3-1
2. IRAN wants Israel destroyed and jews killed. Obama and Dems helped them immensely
3. Nazis were socialists as are Democrats
4. Dems love Obama who committed most ANTI-SEMITIC ACT in the world
5. Racial bigotry. Destroying Blacks
6. Democrats want to destroy free speech
7. Democrats advocating violence against opponents
8. Dems cherish virulent anti-Semites
9. Explicit influence by Nazis on US Left
10.. Hitler insisted on confiscation of all guns, leaving Jews defenseless. Today's democrat agenda is gun confiscation.
11. Corrupt state organs for their nefarious purposes.
2. IRAN wants Israel destroyed and jews killed. Obama and Dems helped them immensely. 52/54 Dem. Senators supported Obama’s genocidal Iran deal, which uses Obamadollars to become world’s greatest financer of Islamic terror. Iran daily announces is intention to exterminate 7 million Jews in Israel and has Israel surrounded now. They are intensifying their war vs Israel. Obama sent secret emissaries to mullahs in 2008 promising them then great deal if he got elected. Democrats have aided and abetted a regime that seeks the extermination of 7 million Jews.
3. Nazis were socialists as are Democrats. Democrats are increasingly embracing socialism, (Bernie sanders/Elizabeth Warren) which is the disease that destroyed once wealthy Venezuela and has people eating their pets now. Nazi-National Socialists.
4. Dems love Obama who committed most ANTI-SEMITIC ACT in the world in 2016 according to the Simon Wiesenthal Institute of Nazi hunters with his UN abstention on the way out the door.
5. Destroying Blacks: Like Nazis, always hated Blacks. Backs suffered in every measurable category under 8 years of Obama. Every slave was owned by Democrats. KKK was 100% Dem. They resisted every civil rights bill and amendment. Planned Parenthood was started by Democrat for the purpose of killing Back babies. Now Democrats control inner cities, and promoted welfare, which are modern day plantations and have destroyed the Black family and led to 6 generations of welfare dependency, massive Black deaths by other Blacks. Many race riots, urged on by Al Sharpton after dozens of White House visits occurred under Obama. Racial tension massive surge. TRUMP: record LOW Black unemployment achieved in just one year.
6. Democrats want to destroy free speech for those who disagree with them. Continuing efforts on campuses, stop talk radio, disrupt rallies, threaten harm.
8. Dems cherish virulent anti-Semites. Pictures of smiling Obama and Farakhan, Obama’s minister Jew hating Jeremiah Wright, Keith Ellison elected VP of DNC, Linda Sarsour leads Women’s march despite virulent jew hatred, Obama dining with Rashid Khalidi and Edward Said
9. Explicit influence by Nazis on US Left. see
https://www.amazon.com/Big-Lie-Exposing-Roots-…/…/1621573486
10. Hitler insisted on
confiscation of all guns, leaving Jews defenseless. Today's democrat agenda is gun confiscation.
12. more on Raw Anti Semitism.
Caroline Glick "
Which brings us to the Democratic Party.
Corbyn’s statement recalled a statement then-Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) made during the 2008 presidential campaign.
“There is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel that you’re anti-Israel,” Obama
told an audience in Ohio.
Likud is Israel’s ruling party. It won the last three elections. By insinuating that Likud is illegitimate, Obama rejected the legitimacy of Israelis who elect Likud to lead them.
In addition, during the 2008 election and throughout his presidency, Obama diligently obfuscated his associations with antisemites.
Consider his relationship with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.
Farrakhan is the most prominent and politically powerful antisemite in America.
He has a four-decade record of viciously antisemitic statements along the lines of the posts at the Palestine Live Facebook group. He has
called Hitler “a very great man.” He has
referred to Judaism as “a gutter religion,” and to Jews as “satanic.” He
accused “Jews” of perpetrating the 9/11 attacks.
For Farrakhan, anti-Jewish bigotry has never been a bug in an otherwise wonderful system. Jew hatred has been a central feature of his public life.
During a Democratic primary debate in 2008, moderator Tim Russert
asked Obama to comment on the fact that a few days before the debate, Farrakhan endorsed him at a Nation of Islam convention. Referring to Farrakhan respectfully as “Minister Farrakhan,” Obama said dryly, “I have been very clear in my denunciation of Minister Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic comments.”
He added, “I have consistently distanced myself from him.”
When Russert asked him if he rejected Farrakhan’s support, Obama demurred.
“I did not solicit his support. But I can’t say to somebody that he can’t say that he thinks I’m a good guy,” Obama said.
Obama’s relationship with Farrakhan returned to the news in January when photo-journalist Askia Muhammad published a photograph he took of the two men together at a 2005 Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) meeting when Obama was a serving U.S. Senator.
Askia
told a reporter that the CBC asked him to hide it.
“I gave the picture up at the time and basically swore secrecy,” to prevent Obama’s association with Farrakhan from harming his future presidential prospects, Askia
explained.
“After the nomination was secured and all the way up until the inauguration: then for eight years after he was President, it was kept under cover.”
Rather than disavowing Farrakhan, after Askia’s photograph was published, leading African American lawmakers have embraced him.
Representative Danny Davis (D-IL) told the
Daily Caller that Farrakhan is “an outstanding human being.”
Davis
explained that in Chicago, Farrakhan is not a fringe figure.
“I don’t regard Louis Farrakhan as an aberration or anything. I regard him as an outstanding human being who commands a following of individuals who are learned and articulate and he plays a big role in the lives of thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of people.”
As for Farrakhan’s hatred of Jews, “That’s just one segment of what goes on in our world. The world is so much bigger than Farrakhan and the Jewish question and his position on that and so forth.”
A week before Davis called him an “outstanding,” mainstream leader, Farrakhan gave a
virulently antisemitic sermon at the Nation of Islam’s Saviors’ Day celebration. He referred to Jews as “satanic” and said, “powerful Jews are my enemies.”
Like the members of Palestine Live Facebook page, Farrakhan promoted the conspiracy theory that Jews control Hollywood and the U.S. government, including the FBI. And the U.S. isn’t the only country controlled by “Satanic Jews”: Poland, Ukraine, France, Germany and Mexico are also controlled by Jews who “take on the culture, the money, the business,” of those countries, he said.
Farrakhan also gave a shout out to Tamika Mallory, one of the leaders of the Women’s March, among the most important organizing forces in the Democratic Party today.
As the Anti-Defamation League
noted, “Mallory posted two Instagram photos from the event, which Carmen Perez, another Women’s March organizer, commented on with ‘raise the roof’ emojis.”
Mallory
referred to Farrakhan as the “GOAT,” or “Greatest of All Time,” on her Instagram page. Her co-chairs, Perez and Linda Sarsour, have both
expressed admiration for Farrakhan. After his statements at the Saviors’ Day sermon gained wide exposure, the Women’s March put out a boilerplate condemnation of racism without mentioning Farrakhan.
Daily Caller Associate Editor Peter Hasson reported that
seven Democratic Congressman have held multiple meetings with Farrakhan. And Democratic National Committee Vice-Chairman Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) is one of them. Like then presidential candidate Obama in 2008, Ellison
made light of his relationship with Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam when he first ran for Congress in 2006 and during his campaign for DNC Chair in 2016.
None of the 21 Democratic lawmakers who were present at the 2005 CBC meeting with Farrakhan that Obama attended in 2005 responded to Hasson’s
request to denounce Farrakhan.
Indeed, far from denouncing him, the CBC has denounced his Jewish critics, and Israel.
When Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN) was questioned about his association with Farrakhan, he
attacked Israel and the Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC), speaking in the name of the CBC.
The RJC called for Carson and the other Democratic lawmakers who met with Farrakhan to resign. But rather than apologize for embracing a man who applauds Hitler, Carson rejected the legitimacy of the RJC
“That organization doesn’t have any credibility with me,” he declared.
He continued, “The Congressional Black Caucus is asking that organization to condemn [Israeli Prime Minister] Benjamin Netanyahu and the [Israeli] government for discriminating against Africans who are migrating [to Israel], who are fleeing dictatorships, who are fleeing oppression. There’s a great deal of bigotry and racism happening right now they fail to condemn.”
(For factual information on Israel’s treatment of illegal immigration from Africa, see
here.)
Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel has
asked DNC Chairman Tom Perez to address his party’s ties to Farrakhan “America’s leading anti-Semite.” To date, Perez has remained mum.
Then there is Obama’s consigliere, Valerie Jarrett. In an appearance on NBC’s
The View, Jarrett tried to defend Mallory for her association with Farrakhan. Jarrett
compared Mallory’s association with Farrakhan to her association with Rupert Murdoch and the Koch brothers, whom Jarrett met with during her tenure at the White House.
Which brings us back to Britain’s Labour party.
Like Corbyn, the Democrats have responded to the exposure of their close ties to the most powerful antisemite in the United States by deflecting the issue. They have drawn moral equivalences between Farrakhan and the government of Israel, and between Farrakhan and leading conservatives.
They have also embraced him as a “great man” who cannot be dismissed or rejected simply because he seeks the annihilation of the Jewish state of Israel, views the American Jewish community as his “enemy,” thinks the Holocaust was justified, and regards Hitler as a “very great man.”
Until he took over Labour, Corbyn was
considered a fringe figure in the Labour party. Likewise, until recently, the Congressional Black Caucus was viewed as being on the
leftist margins of the party. But as the forces of the far left have risen to positions of prominence in the party, the CBC has become a
major player.
Ellison is not a fringe Democrat. He nearly won the election for DNC chair. His constituency is so large and committed that Perez made him Vice Chairman immediately after he was elected.
Collier’s damning report strengthens the growing sense that Britain’s Labour Party has already gone over the brink. Antisemitism is a central and undeniable rationale for its policies. As for the Democratic Party, it is still possible that the party’s rank-and-file will reject their leadership’s embrace of antisemitism through Farrakhan.
But with each passing day, it is becoming more difficult to imagine that happening.
11. Corrupt state organs for their nefarious purposes.
IRS
https://legalinsurrection.com/2017/10/irs-apologizes-for-targeting-conservative-groups/
Justice dept.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-bill-clinton-loretta-lynch-meet-on-tarmac-in-phoenix/ and
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2166192/House-votes-hold-Attorney-General-Eric-Holder-contempt-Congress-Fast-Furious-scandal.html
Now
What is the FBI hiding?
Posted: 06 Apr 2018 04:17 AM PDT
In her weekly Wall Street Journal column tomorrow. Kim Strassel asks “What is the FBI hiding?” Her query is prompted by the resistance of the FBI to producing documents bearing on the synthetic Trump-Russia collusion scandal that has consumed the Trump administration since its inception.
Strassel notes that House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes has just sent another letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray to demand yet again that they comply with an August 2017 subpoena and hand over, among other things, the electronic communication—“EC” in investigative jargon—that officially kicked off the counterintelligence investigation. In his letter, Rep. Nunes states that the FBI has provided only a “heavily redacted” version of the EC. Beyond that, the FBI would prefer not to give it up.
Rep. Nunes is not amused. He writes: “On March 23, 2018, the FBI’s Assistant Director for Legislative Affairs informed the Committee that the FBI would refuse to further unredact the EC based on its supposed sensitivity. The document in question is not highly classified, and law enforcement sources have apparently not been shy about leaking to the press information that the Department and Bureau refuse to share with Congress.”
Sara Carter has posted a PDF of the Nunes letter along with her story on it. I have uploaded it to Scribd and embedded it below.
