Democrats
endanger all of us through their hostile attitude towards border security.
Why? "The Democrats have staked their future on importing voters in violation of the law, since the voters they already have mostly prefer not to have many children. Republicans, in turn, have staked their future on preserving the rule of law, and on preserving an America more or less like the one we know. It comes down, ultimately, to a contest between preserving America vs. preserving the Democratic Part." Powerline blog
5 examples of how the Democrats do not want any border security.
Why? "The Democrats have staked their future on importing voters in violation of the law, since the voters they already have mostly prefer not to have many children. Republicans, in turn, have staked their future on preserving the rule of law, and on preserving an America more or less like the one we know. It comes down, ultimately, to a contest between preserving America vs. preserving the Democratic Part." Powerline blog
5 examples of how the Democrats do not want any border security.
1. Walls
work:
2. Israel—illegal
immigration down 99%
San Diego—down 92%
El Paso—down 95%
Tucson—down 90%
Yuma—down 95%
San Diego—down 92%
El Paso—down 95%
Tucson—down 90%
Yuma—down 95%
Democrats
OPPOSE the wall. In the mid-2000s, many prominent Democrats in
Congress voted to spend billions on security fencing along the U.S.-Mexico
border, and some criticized the “sanctuary cities” that are now in the Trump
administration’s crosshairs.
3.
Democrats voted against Kate law. One of the two bills
was Kate's Law, which would have strengthened the sentences for people who
are caught entering the country illegally two or more times.
Introduced by Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), the legislation is named after Kate Steinle, the 32-year-old woman who was killed in July
2015 by an illegal alien who had several felony convictions and had been
deported from the United States five times. Ms. Steinle was shot to death while
she was walking along the San Francisco pier with her dad.
Kate's law was
designed to strengthen federal law by increasing the maximum
sentence for illegal reentry into the U.S. to five years. It created a new
illegal reentry penalty of up to 10 years for anyone who had previously been
denied admission or deported at least three times, and would have
imposed a five-year mandatory minimum sentence for anyone convicted of
illegal reentry who had a prior aggravated felony or had been convicted of
illegal reentry twice before.
The final vote on Kate's law was 55-42, five less than
needed for cloture
4.
Senate Democrats Block Anti-Sanctuary
City Law. The second bill, the Stop Dangerous
Sanctuary Cities Act, was
introduced by Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA). The sanctuary city
bill also has ties to Kate Steinle. Four months before Ms. Steinle was murdered, her
accused killer Juan Lopez-Sanchez, was in federal prison for re-entering
the country after his fifth deportation. As his deportation neared, the federal prison
officials transferred him to the San Francisco sheriffm who
had an outstanding warrant on him for an old marijuana possession
violation. When he was transferred, immigration officials issued an
"immigration detainer," requesting they be notified before
his release so they could take custody of Lopez-Sanchez and begin the
deportation process. But, because San Francisco is a sanctuary city,
on April 15th Juan Lopez-Sanchez was released without notifying
immigration
5. 5. A group of Democrats chose to stake a position on the far
left of abolishing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE).
No comments:
Post a Comment