Bernie hides his Jewishness and will increase anti-Semitism

Some Jews are proud a Jew is a serious candidate for president. They are very misguided for several reasons

1. Bernie is a NEGATIVE role model for Jews. He HIDES his Jewishness. In his speech he said he is the son of "Polish immigrants" Every real jew would say "Polish Jewish immigrants". He has said he was born Jewish but that is all. Just what we need. The most prominent jew in the nation ignoring his Jewishness and saying it has no impact on his life.Lieberman is an Orthodox Jew and was a positive role model. Sanders has stayed far away from organized American Jewish life both personally and professionally, and the U.S. Jewish establishment in turn had a hard time regarding as one of its own a secular socialist congressional iconoclast who has never belonged to a synagogue, never appeared at pro-Israel rallies or AIPAC events, and has refrained from returning to the Jewish state since his now-infamous kibbutz stint in the 1960’s. Sanders has never referred to his Judaism except in jest - as in his Saturday Night Live appearance - or when asked directly about it by a reporter

2. He will INCREASE ANTI SEMITISM anti semitism once the nation realizes his "free stuff" will massively increase taxes and double our already terrible debt. It will be loads of references to Jews and money. The Bernie plan will ruin the economy for all

Taxes matter. People leave states because taxes are high. The reason companies have gone overseas is because we have the highest tax rates in the world for corporations. Bernie raising taxes creates a DISINCENTIVE for people and companies to work. There is a point at which people say “why bother” when they work more and more for the government. Democrat JFK understood lower taxes produce more growth. Reagan proved it.

Bernie plan is dangerous. Socialism=government controls the means of production and distribution of income. Countries that do that cannot field their own people and the 3 major countries that tried it killed at least 50 million people each last century: China under mao, Russia under Stalin, Germany under Hitler. Bernie says he is a Democratic socialoist but he actually is an old communist. Honeymooned in the Soviet Union.

3. His israel "advisors are all viciously anti israel. Israel hater Bernie sanders http://freebeacon.com/…/meet-bernie-sanders-israel-hating-…/

4. He BLAMES Israel http://www.dailywire.com/news/3952/sanders-dearborn-muslims-israels-existence-blame-robert-kraychik

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262171/bernie-sanders-meets-leader-designated-terrorist-joe-kaufman

If you HATE Israel, and love Islamic terrorism, here is who to support

If you HATE Israel, and love Islamic terrorism, here is who to support

1. Bernie sanders http://freebeacon.com/national-security/meet-bernie-sanders-israel-hating-advisers/

He BLAMES Israel http://www.dailywire.com/news/3952/sanders-dearborn-muslims-israels-existence-blame-robert-kraychik

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262171/bernie-sanders-meets-leader-designated-terrorist-joe-kaufman

2. Hillary Clinton 10 reasons why Islamic terrorists want Hillary to be president

http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2016/01/why-islamic-terrorists-want-hillary-to.html  
Long anti-Israel history http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/11/hillarys-anti-israel-history-

3. This after 8 years of a jhadist Democratic President http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2016/03/the-evidence-is-clear-that-obama-aids.html

Democrats have turned on israel

Why Did Support for Israel Become a Partisan Issue? Posted: 06 Feb 2016 11:27 AM PST (John Hinderaker) Historically, Americans have strongly supported the State of Israel. For a considerable time, that support was bipartisan, much as opposition to Communism was a bipartisan consensus for most of the Cold War era. At one time, sympathy for Israel may even have been more widespread among Democrats than Republicans. But in recent years, the parties have diverged sharply on the Mideast conflict. This Gallup chart shows the progression: Currently, fewer than 50% of Democrats say that they sympathize more with Israel than with the Palestinians. The sharp drop in the past year presumably is due to President Obama’s open feud with Prime Minister Netanyahu. What is striking to me is that the divide between the parties predates the Obama administration. In 2001, the parties were equal in their support for Israel, as Democratic sympathy jumped sharply. But after 2001, Republican support for Israel rose rapidly, while Democratic sympathy declined and then leveled off. The current divide between the parties–83% GOP support vs. 48% Democratic–is basically a continuation of that trend. So why did the parties diverge after 2001? Republicans became deeply concerned about Islamic terrorism after 9/11, and the vast majority saw Israel’s struggles with Palestinian terrorism to be another front in the same war. It is easy to see, therefore, why nearly all Republicans are sympathetic to Israel. Democratic reaction to 9/11 and ensuing events was more mixed. The “chickens coming home to roost” theory was accepted by some. Moreover, many Democrats who didn’t buy the more extreme version of that theory believed that our support for Israel was the cause (or a substantial cause) or radical Islamic anger toward the United States. Therefore, throughout the 2000s, when liberals offered alternatives to the Bush administration’s policies on Islamic terror, those alternatives generally came down to selling out Israel. That message seems to have gotten through to a considerable portion of the party’s rank and file. It is interesting, and a little surprising, I think, that President Obama’s hostility toward Israel doesn’t seem to have been a major factor in driving opinion within his party, at least not until his open conflict with Netanyahu last year. Perhaps most Democrats didn’t recognize Obama’s hostility until then, preferring to believe his professions of friendship. Or perhaps his coolness toward Israel reflected the views of many Democrats from the beginning. The Gallup data support that conclusion. In any event, it is unfortunate that support for Israel has become a partisan issue. I don’t think that is the case with respect to any other ally; certainly not to the same extent.

Islamic terror spreads all over and Obama and Hillary assist them

How Liberals/Democrats are destroying the world by enabling Islamic jihadism,
just as Hillary enabled Bill's sexual assaults by attacking his victims, 

Islamic terror is destroying Europe through the planned invasion of Isis fighters in the guide of refugees. The Paris mastermind confessed he came in group of 90 Isis fighters posing as refugees. Other Islamic terror groups are mass murdering in Africa. http://www.wsj.com/articles/jihad-comes-to-africa-1454693025, as well as taking over Libya, yemen, vast parts of Iraq and Syria. The racist left/liberals do not care because the victims are not white, and the delusional left loves the mass murderers, suggesting they are just poor refugees, even though 80% are military age men. This besides Obama's catastrophic Iran deal Iran has new hundreds of BILLIONS in new business, spending huge amounts on terrorism. All part of jihadist obama's plan. http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2016/01/obamaradical-islamic-jihadist-hundreds.html and clearly the terrorists want Hillary to win. 10 reasons why: http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2016/01/why-islamic-terrorists-want-hillary-to.html

How Obama midwifed Isis http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2016/01/how-obama-midwifed-isis-and-led-to.html

A vote for Hillary is a vote to get your daughter raped

Hillary did not care when her husband raped and abused women. In fact, she led the campaign to further abuse them. Now she, and all Democrats

want to import 100,000 Muslim rapefugees, on top of the million Muslims Obama has allowed to immigrate. 1. FBI says they are unvettable 2. 25% current USA Muslims support violent jihad. 3 80% Rapefugees are military age men. 4. At least 13% admit to supporting Isis. 5. Isis can now make US Customs foolproof passports.

Our radical Dem candidate for Senator in Illinois, Tammy Duckworth wants to import 200,000 rapefugees. Why? Because 80% Muslims vote democratic. they don't care if your daughter gets raped.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7557/germany-rape-migrants-crisis

Public spaces are becoming perilous for women and children

Bernie, There’s no such thing as a free lunch. How sanders will destroy America

Bernie,

There’s no such thing as a free lunch. How sanders will destroy America

10 wackiest Bernie ideas  http://www.dailywire.com/…/here-are-bernie-sanders-top-10-w…

1.       Can’t get the money from “millionaires and billionaires”.

a.       They are already paying a HUGE portion of the taxes http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-rich-now-pay-way-more-than-their.html The top 1% pay 22.7% of taxes. The top 10% pay 50% of taxes. The top 20% pay 65.3% of taxes. The top 40% pay 84.3% of taxes.

b.      There isn’t enough money from them to pay for all the free stuff Bernie suggests, even if you taxed at 90%

c.       Congress would never go for it because they know it is dangerous

2.       The Bernie plan will ruin the economy for all

a.       Taxes matter. People leave states because taxes are high. The reason companies have gone overseas is because we have the highest tax rates in the world for corporations. Bernie raising taxes creates a DISINCENTIVE for people and companies to work. There is a point at which people say “why bother” when they work more and more for the government. Democrat JFK understood lower taxes produce more growth. Raegan proved it.

b.      http://www.wsj.com/articles/price-tag-of-bernie-sanders-proposals-18-trillion-1442271511 

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/369999/socialisms-sad-estate-tom-rogan

3.       Bernie plan is dangerous. Socialism=government controls the means of production and distribution of income. Countries that do that cannot field their own people and the 3 major countries that tried it killed at least 50 million people each last century: China under mao, Russia under Stalin, Germany under Hitler. Bernie says he is a Democratic socialist but he actually is an old communist. Honeymooned in the Soviet Union. http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/10/bernie-sanders-close-ties-to-world.html

http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2016/01/bernie-sanders-is-actually-die-hard.html

4.       Cannot point to Europe as a good example. https://mises.org/library/greece-illustrates-150-years-socialist-failure-europe

Left-Leaning Economists Question Cost of Bernie Sanders’s Plans

. . . The reviews of some of these economists, especially on Mr. Sanders’s health care plans, suggest that Mrs. Clinton could have been too conservative in their debate last week when she said his agenda in total would increase the size of the federal government by 40 percent. That level would surpass any government expansion since the buildup in World War II.

The increase could exceed 50 percent, some experts suggest, based on an analysis by a respected health economist that Mr. Sanders’s single-payer health plan could cost twice what the senator, who represents Vermont, asserts, and on critics’ belief that his economic assumptions are overly optimistic.

And then there’s Jonathan Chait, in NY Magazine:

Bernie Sanders’s Health Care Plan Does Not Add Up

The centerpiece of Sanders’s domestic agenda is a plan for single-payer health insurance. Sanders claims his plan would immediately produce trillions of dollars in savings through lower health-care costs — not merely bending the cost curve down, as Obamacare has done, but snapping it sharply in the other direction. Kenneth Thorpe, a respected liberal health economist at Emory University, has estimated that Sanders’s plan is “completely implausible.” The Sanders campaign has called Thorpe’s estimates a “complete hatchet job” and, as Sanders’s supporters are wont to do, implied that he is bought and paid for by his corporate masters.

But the trillions of dollars in unspecified savings are not the only magic asterisk in Sanders’s plan. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budgetruns the numbers and finds that, even if you accept Sanders’s assumptions about his savings at face value, his plan would still fall several trillion dollars short of covering its expenses. The analysis also notes that Sanders would have to raise the top marginal tax rate to about 85 percent, which is above the level that economists Peter Diamond and Emmanuel Saez (who strongly support higher taxes on the rich) believe maximizes revenue. That is to say, Sanders would tax the rich at rates so high that even liberal economists suspect they would discourage work and raise less revenue than expected.

5.       Minimum wage: WSJournal 2-5-16 “The evidence continues to roll in: Broad increases in the minimum wage destroy jobs and HURT the working class Americans they are supposed to help.…Jobs, salaries and benefits INCREASE when businesses thrive. If you want to give the working class a path to the middle class, adopt policies that free up businesses.

6.       Under Obama, record poor economic growth, huge expansion of government meddling in business (regulations,)  more businesses fail than start, record # Americans gave up looking for jobs, most new jobs low paying or part time, 50% college kids cannot find full time work, Bernie will make it even worse!

7.       His lies  http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/…/bernie-and-hillary-…

8.       Wanted arms embargo vs ISRAEL .http://www.frontpagemag.com/…/bernie-sanders-yom-kippur-war…

7. Israel hater Bernie sanders http://freebeacon.com/…/meet-bernie-sanders-israel-hating-…//

Where the GOP and Democrats differ on Israel by Richard Baehr

Where the GOP and Democrats differ on Israel

The Iowa caucuses served their usual function in winnowing down the field of ‎candidates to a more manageable number, and a smaller number of realistic ‎possibilities for the nomination. On the Democratic side, barring an indictment for ‎her private server issues with classified information sent and received, former Secretary of State Hillary ‎Clinton remains the overwhelming favorite to be nominated. It is not, however, a ‎sign of strength that she could only win half the vote in Iowa against Vermont ‎Senator Bernie Sanders, a 74-year-old curmudgeonly socialist, who was not even a Democratic Party member until 2015. Clinton appears to lack ‎pretty much all the political skills of her husband and is running a campaign ‎reminiscent of 2008 when she campaigned as if she were entitled to the ‎nomination, and greatly underestimated the threat of Barack Obama. More than ‎half of Americans do not trust her, and she has provided plenty of ammunition to ‎the doubters.‎

The Republican race has settled into a contest between three leading contenders -- ‎Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, businessman/reality TV ‎star Donald Trump and a few pretenders -- former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, New ‎Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Ohio Governor John Kasich, businesswoman Carly ‎Fiorina and former pediatric neurosurgeon Ben Carson. Christie and Kasich have ‎been living in New Hampshire the past few months, much as Ted Cruz did in Iowa, ‎but without gaining the same traction. A Bush super PAC has been blasting ‎Rubio for months, with some damage done to Rubio but no noticeable gain for ‎Bush. The results in Iowa -- a win for Cruz, with Trump second and Rubio a closer-‎than-expected third, has shaken up both the state and national polls. A new ‎national poll has Trump at 25%, and Cruz and Rubio at 21% each.‎

In a week, Cruz has stayed where he was, despite the Iowa victory, and Rubio has ‎doubled his share, almost all at Trump's expense. Trump's campaign has been ‎largely based on the fact that he is a winner, will make America win again and he ‎is winning in all the polls. When the first actual votes did not deliver a win for ‎Trump, a good bit of the bubble was burst.‎

Looking at the five remaining candidates who could be nominated (including ‎Sanders is a stretch), foreign policy and Israel are a major dividing line between ‎the parties, similar to so many other issues. Historically, this has not been the case -- ‎support for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship transcended party lines. As the ‎Democratic Party has moved left, steered there in large part by President Obama, ‎many Democrats have begun to echo the sentiments on Israel so common on the left, and so pervasive in academia and the media. At the Democratic convention in ‎‎2012, angry anti-Israel invective coming from the delegates was ignored by the ‎convention chair, who ruled that various pro-Israel measures had passed on a ‎voice vote, when clearly they had not. It has gotten worse since then. ‎Obama has not lifted a finger to condemn the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement and the harassment ‎and intimidation of pro-Israel students on campus. Pretty much any speaker ‎supporting Israel at any public event can now expect nasty anti-Semitic activists ‎trying to shout them down. Supporting Israel is viewed these days as similar to ‎supporting fossil fuels, or even worse, the police. On the left, there is a theme of intersectionality that unites various activist groups, and those who oppose Israel are right at ‎home with the Black Lives Matter movement, various leftist unions, and open-‎borders supporters.‎

Obama has been arguably the least sympathetic president toward Israel ‎since Jimmy Carter. Carter, however can claim a role in the Camp David accords, ‎which effectively ended the state of war between Egypt and Israel. It was of course ‎Anwar Sadat who paid the ultimate price for making peace, gunned down by ‎assassins. ‎

Obama has attempted to make the U.S. position toward Israel mirror that of the EU ‎nations and the United Nations. Israel is to blame for the failure of peace talks, and ‎settlements and the intransigence of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are the reasons there is no ‎peace. Palestinian disinterest in even talking to Israel, their incitement and worship ‎of terrorists is always downplayed. Terrorism is regarded as understandable, ‎given the occupation. ‎

Obama is ever ready to claim his own great achievement -- the Iranian nuclear ‎accord, which so far has produced a cash windfall for Iran, the end of most ‎sanctions, and significant new business deals for the formerly isolated nation, in ‎exchange for a partial reduction in the country's nuclear program. And as ‎expected, Iran's international belligerence has picked up, including the capture and humiliation of U.S. sailors; ballistic missile tests, some very close to U.S. assets; and ‎stepped up military support for their allies in Syria and Yemen. The anti-Israel and ‎anti-American rhetoric are as high as ever. Holocaust denial seems to have ‎become a favored activity. The idea that the deal would change Iranian behavior, ‎open up the society, and make them better behaved on the world stage, was a ‎farcical notion, already debunked. Yes, the United States can now call the Iranians ‎‎(or some of them) to plead for something, but pretty much every difficult issue has ‎been resolved in the Iranians' favor. As for opening up the society, about 99% of ‎the candidates for elections who were not adherents of the theocratic rulers, were ‎knocked off the ballot. The mullahs are still fully in charge, now playing with a new ‎stack of cash.‎

The deal was supported by 42 of 46 Democratic senators, and 85% of Democratic ‎House members. When Obama said jump, they jumped. Loyalty is now ‎very important or Democrats could be challenged from the left the next time they ‎seek office. Both Clinton and Sanders supported the Iran deal. Clinton has given a ‎few talks trying to create a little space between her own views on Israel and ‎Obama's, trying to reassure Jewish donors and liberal Jewish voters. But they ‎had the feel of one more point on a list checked off.‎

On the Republican side, the foreign policy views of Donald Trump are truly ‎unknown. There is no evidence that he has thought seriously about the Israeli-‎Palestinian conflict. Given his common sense theme for his presidency, he might ‎wind up on the pro-Israel side, but this is a guess. A week ago, this uncertainty was ‎a bigger concern. This week, the chances of Trump being the nominee are a good ‎bit lower. Had Trump won Iowa, he could have run the table with the first few ‎states, and made himself a heavy favorite for the nomination. ‎

There is very good news for Israel with the two Cuban-American senators -- Cruz ‎and Rubio. Both have been forthright about specific initiatives were they elected, ‎designed to demonstrate that American support for Israel was no longer in ‎question. Pulling back on some or all of the Iran deal would be part of this, but ‎there is also the possibility of a U.S. embassy move to Jerusalem, commitments to ‎back Israel in the U.N. Security Council, a change in the State Department's perpetual ‎war on Israel, a commitment to consultation with Israel rather than public attacks, ‎and even new American policy on various issues related to Israel's borders and ‎rights under international law. Whether any of this will matter to Jewish-American ‎voters is not clear. But it might boost turnout among Christian supporters of Israel, ‎a far larger group.‎

Cruz spoke abut Israel in his victory speech on Monday night. It is a sign ‎that for leading Republicans, Israel is not an afterthought, as it appears to be for ‎the Democrats.‎

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar. Donald leans over, and With A smile on his face, says, "The media are really tearing you apart for That Scandal."

Hillary is the most corrupt person ever to run for President. Murderer, thief, pathological liar.

Questions:

1.       Why do you lie about your emails, claiming no highly classified emails were on your private server, when the law clearly says even if unmarked, it is not allowed?

2.       Where is the missing $6 billion from the State department?

3.       Why did you lie to the nation for weeks, and still do, blaming Benghazi on  a video no on e watched, when you knew within hours it was an organized Al-Qaida attack?

4.       Why did you lie about being in sniper fire?

5.       Why did you lie about being named for Sir Hillary?

6.       Why have over 80 associates of yours died under mysterious circumstances after it was clear they might embarrass you? Why does bill’s mistress worry about you killing her? http://www.infowars.com/if-i-die-by-committing-suicide-dont-believe-it-bills-former-mistress-fears-hillarys-wrath/

7.       What did you promise the world’s worst nations in exchange for the massive bribes/donations to your phony Clinton Foundation?

8.       Why did you lead the abuse of the women your husband abused and call them liars when you also say women who charge abuse should be believed?

9.       Why, under your watch, did Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Syria all disintegrate?

10.   Why, under your watch, did Isis come into existence?

11.   Why did you have the “reset button” with Russia at the same time Putin is invading Ukraine?

12.   Why do your emails contain such vicious attacks on Israel?

13.   Why is a 75 year old socialist giving you such a run for your money>?>

14.   Why do 60% of Americans think you dishonest?

15.   Why do you double down on the worst presidency in US history and want to continue it? Record poverty, doubling all previous US debt, avg economic growth of 1.5%, massive expansion of Islamic terrorism, increased racial tension, record   quit looking for jobs, most new jobs low paying or part time, total failure of Obamacare,

16.   Why under your watch, do all our allies feel betrayed by USA and our enemies and adversaries emboldened?

17.   Why do you want to bring in 100,000 unvettable Syrian rapefugees, 13% of whom admit support for isis? They are raping their way through Europe.

18.   How could you support Obama’s catastrophic Iran deal?

19.   How could you propose $19 trillion in new spending and not think it will bankrupt USA? Her plans will bankrupt USA. Plans $1 trillion in new spending. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article51084285.html

20.   Your main spiritual mentor is the ultra radical Saul Alinsky and his book “Rules for radicals” . How deeply has that influenced your values

21.   You say “no walls” “build bridges” How then do you propose to stop illegal I mmigration and all the violent crime that comes with them, or don’t you care?

22.   How exactly will “more love and kindness” stop Isis?

Please explain all these scandals: Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar. Donald leans over, and With A smile on his face, says, "The media are really tearing you apart for That Scandal."

Hillary: "You mean my lying about Benghazi?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean the massive voter fraud?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "You mean the military not getting their votes counted?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Using my secret private server with classified material to Hide my Activities?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Using the Clinton Foundation as a cover for tax evasion, Hiring Cronies,

And taking bribes from foreign countries?

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million, and right afterward it

Declared Bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Whitewater, Watergate committee, Vince Foster, commodity Deals?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "The IRS targeting conservatives?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Turning Libya into chaos?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Trashing Mubarak, one of our few Muslim friends?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Turning our backs on Israel?"

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "The joke Iran Nuke deal? "

Trump: "No the other one:"

Hillary: "Leaving Iraq in chaos? "

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "The DOJ spying on the press?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Giving our cronies in SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and 3 Months

Later they declared bankruptcy and then the Chinese bought it?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "The NSA monitoring citizens' ?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "The State Department interfering with an Inspector General Investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Me, The IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "Threats to all of Bill's former mistresses to keep them quiet"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: That my emails reveal deep seated anti israel conversations over many years

Trump: "No, the other one"

Hillary: "That i say i want to build on Obama';s successes except everyone knows he has been the worst president in US history?"

Trump: "No, the other one."

Hillary: "I give up! ... Oh wait, I think I've got it! When I stole the White House furniture, silverware and China when Bill left Office?"

Trump: "THAT'S IT! I almost forgot about that one".

Everything above is true. Yet she still gets the Democratic votes. Could there be that many stupid people in this country???