Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Obama's continuing concessions and lies about the Iran nuclear deal

Obama’s Cascade of Iran Concessions Continues

This morning the Wall Street Journal editorializes on the latest concessions in President Obama’s pursuit of his Lausanne legacy: (1) defunding the Lebanese civil-society initiative that was an alternative to Iran-sponsored Hezbollah; (2) removing the CFO of the A.Q. Khan nuclear-proliferation network from the sanctions list; (3) eliminating sanctions on Iran’s ballistic missile program; and (4) ending sanctions on 23 of 24 Iranian banks. These come on top of: (i) early elimination of all nuclear sanctions, (ii) waiving answers to outstanding International Atomic Energy Agency questions before signing a deal, (iii) a huge “signing bonus,” (iv) the lack of “anywhere, any time” inspections, (v) subjection of “snap back” sanctions to an unrealistic administrative process, (vi) failure to dismantle any centrifuges (which will simply be stored) or facilities (which will continue to operate), and (vii) the sunset provision that guarantees Iran nuclear capability at the end of the agreement. And these are not likely to be the last concessions.
Iran will likely want to run the negotiations past the June 30 “deadline,” if only to demonstrate again that an Obama “deadline” is the only date by which a new deadline must be set. If the president wishes to avoid the embarrassment of another ignored “deadline,” he will likely face a last-minute demand for a compensating concession. Moreover, in any negotiation in which one party knows the other is too invested in the deal to abandon it, the first party will frequently make a last-minute demand, secure in the knowledge that it is too late for the other party to reject it. The president has disclosed publicly that he believes there is no viable alternative to a deal, and the cost of that disclosure is likely to be another last-minute demand.
It is perhaps worth remembering in this connection that on September 22, 1938, Neville Chamberlain flew to Germany to meet with Hitler and conclude the Munich agreement, having already joined France in pressuring Czechoslovakia to hand over the Sudeten lands to Hitler. To his profound shock, Chamberlain found that Hitler had more last-minute demands, which were “proposals of a kind which I had not contemplated at all.” But a week later, Chamberlain essentially accepted them, and returned to cheering crowds happy for “peace in our time.” The rest is history, which may be repeating itself.
We do not know what the culminating Obama concession will be, only that it is not likely that we have seen it yet."


Obama's many lies about Iran deal.
Observation:On Wednesday, Iran rejected most of the concessions it reportedly agreed to undertake. Top Iranian leaders are describing the framework as a ‘lie’ and announced that international nuclear inspectors will not be permitted to enter any of its contested military sites.
1. Iran can be successful regional power in compliance with our norms of behavior
2. 99.9% Muslims want want we want
3. Iran can be counted on to abide by agreements
4. Inspectors can verify compliance
5. This deal will guarantee Iran won't get bomb
6. My sanctions hampered their efforts
7. They have fawta vs use nuclear bomb
8. Their faith precludes use of nuclear bomb
9. I will protect Israel
10. We and Iran agree on the terms of the deal

Obama lies by omission. Neglects to state
1. His top aids :Kerry, Valarie Jarett, Susan Rice have deep ties to Iran
2. Iran's ongoing spread of terrorism on 5 continents
3. Iran's ongoing talk of destroying Israel and USA
4. Iran's ICBM and submarine programs
5. His extensive, long enduring Islamic support and fraternizing with terrorists
6, Sending secret envoy before 2008 election promising mullahs they'd like his presidency
7. Scoffed at Israel's demand that Israel's right to exist be prerequisite
Details below  http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/obamas-many-many-lies-about-iran-deal.html
Why is he lying about this? He wants help Iran. because he is pro Islmic Jihad
http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/03/why-is-it-so-hard-for-everyone-to-admit.html



Summarizing Iran deal. Obama’s DIPLOMTIC JIHAD
1.    Obama’s framework pact is with the worst terrorist nation on earth “Death to America” and “destroying Israel is “non-negotiable” http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/03/iran-is-worst-nation-on-earth-and-our.html
http://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Iran-helping-Hamas-Hezbollah-build-fleet-of-suicide-drones-396673

c. Iran has consistently lied to UN, ignored their sanctions and decrees, hid their programs. Verification is impossible with them  http://freebeacon.com/national-security/verifying-iran-nuclear-deal-not-possible-experts-say/
3.    Israel asks that at least Iran be forced to accept Israel’s right to exist. Obama blows him off. Obama lied when he said there is a mullah fatwa vs nuclear weapons. He lied when he said Iran faith precluded use of nuclear weapons.
4.    Iran’s president called all this negotiation ‘diplomatic JIHAD”.
5.    Iran has 3 weeks to a bomb or LESS
6.       Iran Deal: Holocaust In 2026 - DickMorris.com
"So the basic tradeoff achieved by Secretary of State John Kerry in the talks with Iran boils down to this: Iran has to watch its step for ten years. Then all bets are off. A year later, bombs away! "
7.    Wall Street Journal “The truth, contrary to the President, is that the critics of his Iran framework do not want war. But they also don’t want a phony peace to lead to a nuclear Middle East that leads to a far more horrific war a decade from now.
8.    The rest of the Middle East (non Iranian stooges) are OPPOSED to this diplomatic jihad. http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/middle-east-arab-leaders-opposed-to.html
9.     This will inevitably lead to war. It is a terrible deal. http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/caroline-glick-obama-has-led-us-to-in.html
10.   Why has Obama led us herehttp://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/03/why-is-it-so-hard-for-everyone-to-admit.html  Obama is a pro radical, pro Islamic extremism, pro jihadist
11.  Further weakens America
13. Obama  and lackeys lies when say Netanyahu offers no alternatives
15. What about the Jews in congress backing Obama on thishttp://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/obama-uses-jews-in-congress-to-shill.html


Opposed to deal:
http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/elder-statesmen-henry-kissinger-and.html
http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/prof-sowell-rips-into-obamas.html
http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/many-weigh-in-on-catastrophic-usiran.html
http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/horovitz-and-horowitz-both-think-obamas.html
http:/



No comments:

Post a Comment