Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Obama has the votes on Iran. Is every Dem in Congress voting for this a traitor or just stupid?

TODAY ""They (the US and the Zionists) should know that the Islamic Revolution will continue enhancing its preparedness until it overthrows Israel and liberates Palestine," Iran's Fars News Agency quoted Brigadier General Mohsen Kazzemeini as saying. Kazzemeini is the IRGC's top commander in the Tehran Province."

 Deal opposed by 216 USA generals and admirals, most former national security staff, American people 2-1. Israelis 7-1, all of Iran's neighbors, every Republican in Ciongress, 14 Dems so far willing to brave the Obama tyranny,

EVERY DEATH from this catastrophic deal will be on the hands of Obama and those Democrats voting for it.

Lesson to be learned from this fight: Vote out Democrats. they endanger USA and world. see article at bottom

Most analyzing the Iran deal misses the CENTRAL POINT: OBAMA HAS ALWAYS WANTED TO HELP IRAN’s Jihadist program. He is playing for the other side. Obama is an evil monster aiding and abetting worldwide Islamic radical jihad as well as working to weaken America.

Why is it so hard for everyone to admit Obama is pro jihad: top 100+ examples

How many were bribed by Iran?   
BRIBES Iran bribing democrats to support deal
Obama's top aid, Jarett, born in Iran.
Hillary top aid Moslem Brotherhood Huma.
Kerry son-in-law Iranian. ona dn on it goes
Fatal flaws of deal/Obama’s 16 lies about deal/Obama’s timeline of deception about deal
Any one of these objections should cause any reasonable member of Congress to vote against this deal. If they vote FOR this deal, it is because they are AFRAID of Obama.   Congressional Dems: DO NOT SIGN THIS IRAN DEAL! Will you be remembered by history as cowardly and dishonorable? Follow the lead of Dem Senators Chuck Schumer and Bob Menendez ““I have looked into my own soul and my devotion to principle may once again lead me to an unpopular course, but if Iran is to acquire a nuclear bomb, it will not have my name on it,” Will you really want YOUR NAME on this odious, genocidal Iran deal?  Follow the lead of these brave colleagues. 

The inherent fatal flaws of this catastrophic Iran deal.
1.      We got fleeced on every issue by Iran.
2.      Gives hundreds of billions to worst nation on earth to strengthen their terrorism.
3.     Gives them 3 paths to nuclear bombs. Liberal democrat Prof Alan Dershowitz says in this deal, Obama gave Iran GREEN LIGHT to build nuks
4.      4. Verification is a joke. They are cheating already. They are threatening IAEA inspectors. They are allowed to inspect themselves and say they will deny access. Under the "side agreement" AP reports that Iran will be allowed to use its own inspectors at the secret Parchin nuclear site under its secret side agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency. The IAEA has sought access to Parchin for more than a decade, and U.S. officials have said the deal requires Iran to come clean about Parchin. Now, the country that lied for years about its nuclear weapons program will be trusted to come clean about those lies.     The news raises further doubts about a nuclear pact that is already leaking credibility. Unfettered access to Parchin is crucial to understanding Iran's past nuclear work. Without understanding how close Iran has come to getting the bomb, it's impossible to know if Iran really is a year or more away from having the bomb. (Wall Street Journal)
5.     They WILL use nuclear weapons on USA and Israel to reestablish Persian dynasty and for theological reasons of hidden 12th imam. They shout “ Death to Israel, death to America” It is not rhetoric.  Endanger USA 6 waysIran's multi front military threat to USA  6 ways
They have 40,000 agents in Latin America and a new front in Canada to strike us. The key is to understand that Iran WILL USE nuclear weapons even if it means self destruction. World’s greatest authority on Islam, Bernard Lewis :  “It is their apocalyptic world view, Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis notes, that distinguishes Iran from other governments with nuclear weapons… Would leaders who did not hesitate to use children as cannon fodder in the war with Iraq, or who send suicide bombers to kill the innocent, be reticent about using nuclear weapons? How can the idea of Mutual Assured Destruction that prevented a superpower clash apply to people who believe the end of the world will lead to “eternal life and martyrdom? 
6.      Overwhelming opposition to it exists in USA and world.
7.      Obama did nothing to weaken ISIS after one year so how can we imagine he’d discipline Iran?
8.      Much better plans have been advanced
9.      section 10 under nuclear security (about pg 142 or so) obligates USA to train and protect Iran against external threats including cyber threats to nuclear facilities.
11.  Obama uses raw anti-Semitism to defend deal. How can you condone that?
12. Iran already stepping up attacks

12.  Here are the main 16 lies Obama tells about the Iran deal
1.     LIE Iran has fatwa vs Nuclear weapons. TRUTH: No such fatwa exists 
2.     LIE Iran will not use nuclear bombs vs Israel or USA TRUTH: For sure they will
3.     LIE American Jews support the deal
TRUTH: They do not and the leftist polls that say otherwise are lies 
Jews who support deal are suicidal, genocidal, fratricidal and ignorant
4.     LIE The deal blocks Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and does not aid their terrorism. Truth: It guarantees them, even if they don’t cheat, which they will. The Obama deal gives $150 BILLION to the world's worst terrorist regime to buy any arms 
5.     LIE Obama will protect Israel. TRUTH: he deal calls for USA to defend IRAN vs Israel! Truth Obama always has hated Israel and wants them destroyed. He can’t do it directly for political reasons. 
6.     LIE Obama is trying to protect the West. TRUTH: Obama is a supporter of radicalized Islamic jihad. Obama is gutting US military
7.     LIE Verification is possible. Truth. Iran has aways cheated. Will cheat. Deal lets them have 3 months notice and to turn in their OWN samples. And they will not allow military site inspections.
8.     Obama’s aids deep ties to Iran. Valarie Jarett born there and speaks Farsi, Kerry’s son-in-law is Iranian. Iranian terrorists attended the wedding, Susan Rice huge investments.
9.     The deal IGNORES Iran’s continuous demonization of Israel and USA, fostering terrorism on 5 continents, their pledge to buy ICBMs with the hundreds of billions they now get etc
10.   Lie There exists no good alternative to this deal. TRUTH Many much better options exist. A third grader could have done better 
11. LIE US Military approved the deal Truth: the have strong reservations
12. LIE Deal Binds Iran to obligations. TRUTH> Their “obligations” are voluntary
13. LIE Everything agreed to has been revealed. Truth: They admit to hiding much
14. LIE 99% world agrees with Obama. Truth the neighbors are very worried and want their own nuks
15. Kerry and obama makes anti-Semitic threat of consequences if deal loses

Below is a series of myths and facts regarding the proposed nuclear agreement with Iran.
Start with Obama myth and then refute:

1.  The choice is this deal or war. The opposite is true. This deal increases the prospects of war. It immediately gives Iran up to $150 billion, which will bolster Iran’s support of terrorism and regional conflicts, requiring a vigorous armed response from neighbors. In the long run, an emboldened and strengthened Iran will seek regional hegemony—dramatically increasing the chances for broader conflict.

2. Iran won’t get a nuclear weapon. This deal does not block Iran’s path to a bomb (see Analysis: An Unacceptable Deal). Instead, the deal legitimizes Iran’s nuclear program and allows it to legally reach a nuclear weapons capability with a breakout time measured in only days.

3. The whole world backs this deal. The negotiations with Iran involved the United States and five other countries—none of Iran’s neighbors were involved. Many countries in the Middle East, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, and other Persian Gulf countries, are deeply concerned about the impact this deal will have on Iran’s ability to fund terrorism and promote instability.

4. With no deal, Iran is free from scrutiny. As a party to the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Iran is forbidden from developing nuclear weapons and must undergo regular IAEA inspections of declared sites. With no deal, Iran is still held to inspections of declared sites and cannot pursue nuclear weapons.

5. With no deal, Iran will sprint to a bomb. If Iran turned on all 19,000 installed centrifuges, breakout time would be about two-to-three months to enrich enough uranium to weapons grade. But first, Iran would have to banish IAEA inspectors and reconfigure its centrifuges to produce highly enriched uranium. Iran knows such a breakout would risk a military strike on its nuclear infrastructure, which would grievously damage a program that took decades and billions of dollars to build.

6. With no deal, sanctions will fall apart. On the first day of the deal’s implementation nearly all financial, investment, and energy sanctions lift. With no deal, the United States continues to impact the behavior of partners, and U.S. statutory sanctions on elements of Iran’s economy continue. Access to the U.S. economy is crucial to most countries and companies, and those that choose to confront the United States on this issue could lose access.

7. “Snapback” will work. The “snapback” mechanism is problematic. It requires up to 65 days to establish and would only apply for major Iranian violations, meaning there are no consequences spelled out for more minor violations. In addition, “snapback” explicitly exempts all international contracts signed before a violation, significantly reducing its impact on Iran.

8. This deal strengthens Iran’s moderates. There is no evidence that this deal will impact Iranian foreign policy, support for terrorism or human rights. Instead, the regime will receive an economic boost of up to $150 billion and renewed oil sales, providing Iran additional resources and legitimacy to pursue its agenda. In fact, the agreement is likely to inspire the regime to expand its extreme behavior as a way to demonstrate its faithfulness to the ethos of the Islamic revolution.

9. This deal extends Iran’s breakout time. Given all that is unknown, such estimates about Iranian nuclear capabilities are speculative at best. According to the administration, Iran’s purported breakout time extends by months, not years. All meaningful restraints on Iran’s nuclear program are removed by year 15, allowing Iran to achieve thereafter a breakout time measured in days.

10. Rejection of a deal is unprecedented. Throughout U.S. history, Congress has rejected agreements negotiated by the executive branch and insisted on substantial changes. Nearly 200 treaties, including 80 multilateral accords, have been modified before they were approved.

Remember this deal with its secret side deal, allows Iran to investigate its own nuclear weapons research site at Parchin


 REJECT A BAD DEAL Throughout the Iran negotiations, the administration repeatedly asserted that “no deal is better than a bad deal,” because it understood that the consequences of a bad deal were far more dangerous than the consequences of no deal. Because this agreement fails to block Iran’s path to a bomb, it is a bad deal. Congress must reject this deal and advance a policy that creates the opportunity for a better deal.

No deal is better than a bad deal. The proposed deal does not satisfy the requirements Congress has set for a good deal in the areas of inspections, possible military dimensions, phased sanctions relief, duration, and dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. It is a bad deal that will allow Iran to legally achieve a nuclear weapons capability. No deal avoids locking in the negative consequences of a bad deal. By choosing no deal, the United States would avoid the unacceptable consequences of this deal. We would avoid legitimizing Iran’s path to a nuclear weapons capability and providing up to $150 billion within months to the leading state sponsor of terrorism—which will use funds to promote instability and undermine our regional allies. And we would avoid increasing the prospect of war, spurring a nuclear arms race, and further strengthening the Iranian regime.

     No deal opens the door to a better deal. Insisting on a better deal has historical precedent. Throughout history, Congress has successfully insisted on improvements to agreements negotiated by the executive branch. For instance, almost 200 treaties, including 80 multilateral accords, have been modified by congressional amendments, reservations or conditions before they were approved. Major arms control agreements, including the second Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT II) and the Threshold Test Ban Treaty, failed to gain initial Senate approval, but ultimately led to new negotiations and improved agreements.

If Congress rejects this deal, the United States will maintain congressionally-enacted sanctions. Other states may lift their sanctions, returning us to the situation we faced between 1996 and 2010 when America led the world by imposing unilateral sanctions on Iran. Iran will still be obligated to honor its commitments under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). If the deal is rejected by Congress, the future of the deal will be cast in doubt. Iran may decide to withdraw from the agreement or remain in the deal without the benefits the U.S. would provide. The president will be obligated to enforce statutory U.S. sanctions that would remain in place, putting continued pressure on Iran and providing leverage to restart multilateral negotiations. It was U.S. leadership in both sanctions and diplomacy that persuaded our allies to join us in a multilateral effort targeting Iran. That leadership will be the foundation for continued economic and diplomatic pressure on Iran. The United States has the world’s largest economy and most important financial system in the world. Our sanctions have proven their global impact to dissuade foreign companies from investing in Iran when faced with the threat of isolation. Skeptics of this agreement understand why it is a bad deal, but question whether there is any alternative path to preventing Iran from attaining a nuclear weapon. In fact, there are far better options than this dangerous agreement. Congress will make America safer by rejecting this deal, continuing the pressure on Iran, and negotiating a better agreement.

1. In 2008, BEFORE assuming presidency, Obama sent secret envoy to Iran promising they’d like his presidency
2. 2009  Dissidents take to streets to overthrow brutal Iranian regime. Obama does nothing but helps Muslim brotherhood terrorist takeover in Egypt, as well as  supported the "Arab Spring" in, Libya and elsewhere more recently. In 2009, demonstrators filled the streets of Iran, denouncing the regime and crying out for freedom.  It was a glorious opportunity for the leader of the free world to demonstrate his support for free people everywhere and strike a decisive blow against the bloody regime that had considered itself at war with the United States for three decades.
But Barack Obama didn't help them.  Quite the contrary.  The leader of the free world was too busy extending his hand to those same mullahs. 1b.
3.      In 2011 sent secret letter to Mullahs promising nuclear enriched uranium (2)
4.      In 2012 debate with Romney, in retrospect obviously LIED,  promised he’d force Iran to shut down nuclear program (3)
5. 2013/2014   Constantly fought tough Congressional sanctions while pretending to support them (3a)
6.  2014 Obama openly states he wants this world's worst nation to be the ":successful regional power" (5)
7.      In 2015 makes deal guaranteeing Iran nuclear bombs, with virtually no verification, giving them everything they want, getting fleeced on every issue. But it was on purpose. To help them! (6) Otherwise it makes no sense. (7) Obama and left uses strong anti-semitic language to fight opposition to plan.
8. Timeline of Obama's hatred of Israel (8)

See souces for TIMELINE here

Lessons learned from the Iran deal fight: vote out dems
The good guys have lost. We can keep battling for a month but only 14 Democrats have sided with the righteous side against evil Obama, (1) and that is not enough. Even though EVERY Republican in Federal office opposes it, as do 200 retired generals and admirals, many from National security, all the Gulf states + Egypt, Israel 7-1, USA 2-1, Jews 2-1, we will lose because a determined president with even 1/3 of Congress on his side can get his way.
Lesson: If you care about the world, and our country, vote out Democrats.
Aipac has tried to remain bipartisan and keep Obama out of it. Did not work. Because, this is 100% about Obama, and the the betrayal of Democratic party to Israel and world safety. It is clear we CANNOT count on Democrats going forward. On top of a long history of Obama’s anti-Israel actions, (2) a long history of Hillary Clinton’s anti-Israel actions and views (3) Biden standing by his jihadist president, the vast majority of Democratic 2012 convention delegates booing Jerusalem in the sessions out loud, (4) it should be clear. We have Obama, Hillary, Biden, Kerry and members of congress voting on this deal who took bribe money from iran! (5) What other lesson can we draw.
To Jews, it is clear. You can be a good Jew, or you can be a Democrat but you can’t be both.
Yes there will always be Jews who side with evil, and are delusional, suicidal, fratricidal and ignorant. Even rabbis. (6) But if this time does not shock Jews away from their idiotic tie to the Democratic party, hard to imagine what might.
It isn’t just about Iran, or the bruising battle Obama will soon engage trying to force a terrorist Palestinian state in the few miles between Israel and the Jordan river,+ Gaza. It is also about how Democratic Party polices HURT the poor, women, middle class, businesses, blacks, college grads looking for jobs, and spread terror through the world by gutting our military, pretending to fight Isis, looking the other way as terror explodes, embracing our enemies while turning our backs on our foes, massive immigration of Muslims, no security on our southern border letting terrorists and criminals in, refusing to see evil as evil, and much more.  Democrats are destroying our country in dozens of way. See them here (7).

To Jews, it is clear. You can be a good Jew, or you can be a Democrat but you can’t be both.
1.     Hillary is the same. Voting for her, we get the same thing as we have now

3.     Hillary is the same. Voting for her, we get the same thing as we have now
6.     Remember JStreet was started by Obama and financed with Iranian and George Soros money. The entire goial is spolit the American jews and defend whatever anti Israel position Obama takes. Ater President Obama took office, J Street founder and executive director Jeremy Ben-Ami told the New York Times, “Our No. 1 agenda item is to do whatever we can in Congress to act as the president’s blocking back. They work with Islamic terrorist groups to undermine Israel. 

A poster at the suburban Tehran mausoleum of Islamic Republic founder Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini shows him, left, with Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. PHOTO: AFP/GETTY IMAGES
The Democrats now own Iran—lock, stock and smoking centrifuges.
It isn’t just the Senate compromise on the Corker bill that made the Iran nuclear deal the party’s exclusive political property. The Democrats own Iran’s entire penetration in the region—Yemen, the Gulf of Aden, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon—pretty much anywhere Ayatollah Ali Khamenei wants to take them.
Senate Democrats, attempting a magical illusion on American voters, say the Iran nuclear threat and the Iran terror threat are separate realities.
Before the Senate’s recent “compromise” vote on Sen. Bob Corker’s Iran review bill, Delaware Sen. Chris Coons and other Senate Democrats, at the White House’s insistence, said while they abhorred Iran’s support for terrorism, it had to be separated from the historic arms deal.
Meanwhile Ayatollah Khamenei, a more unitary thinker, has been surging Iran’s military across the Middle East. With the U.S. on the doorstep of a presidential election, Iran is beginning to look like the Democrats’ Bermuda Triangle. The last time the party’s fortunes went missing in Iran was during what history generally describes as “ Jimmy Carter’s hostage crisis.”

Opinion Journal Video

Wonder Land Columnist Dan Henninger on political parallels with Jimmy Carter’s administration. Photo: Getty Images
After the Iranian hostage crisis had ground through the news for nearly a year, with 52 Americans held in Tehran, Mr. Carter’s competence as president became a campaign issue, which naturally Ronald Reagan exploited. Reagan won 489 electoral votes to President Carter’s 49 in 1980.
A Who’s Who of famous Senate Democrats got wiped out: George McGovern, Frank Church, Herman Talmadge, Mike Gravel, Birch Bayh, Gaylord Nelson, Warren Magnuson.
Let it be noted that the Iran hostage analogy is unfair to Jimmy Carter. Back then, the Iranians grabbed the Americans. This time, the U.S., or at least its president, has grabbed the Iranians and won’t let them go.
Until recently, the Democrats at least could argue that because Mr. Obama ended George Bush’s war in Iraq, he immunized them from direct political blame for the region’s troubles. That the decision to reduce the U.S.’s postwar presence in Iraq to zero allowed Islamic State to metastasize unimpeded was a morass they could push off into the ethers of the “hopeless” Middle East.
Except that the Democratic president erected a steel cable connecting himself directly to Tehran. This being Barack Obama, history had ordained that only he could take on Planet Iran and persuade its population of fanatic Shiite ayatollahs to change their worldview. In the years since Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini presided over the American hostages, taking down a U.S. presidency, Iran’s Islamic Republic has had just one other Supreme Leader—today’s Ayatollah Khamenei, the man at the other end of the steel cable tethered to the White House.
It is now generally understood that completing a major nuclear-arms agreement with Iran was an obsession of Mr. Obama’s from early in his presidency. Up to a point, the Democrats’ normal instincts for self-preservation prevailed. Sufficient numbers of Senate Democrats—Mr. Coons, Bob Menendez, Ben Cardin, Tim Kaine, Chuck Schumer—raised enough questions of substance about the deal to credibly put space between them and a president assembling a major arms-control agreement out of his own head. The risks for Democrats were obvious.
But starting about two weeks ago, the Democrats’ Iran hedge collapsed. The compromise on the Corker bill virtually ensures that whatever agreement John Kerry outputs in Switzerland—a deal that increasingly looks built on sand—will pass unimpeded through the Senate. It looks a lot like ObamaCare, with congressional Democrats once again doing a pass-it-to-find-out-what’s-in-it for another Obama legacy.
But Saudi Arabia isn’t the American Hospital Association, and Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani isn’t Nancy Pelosi. The religious and military forces in motion in the Middle East now are powerful and volatile. Vladimir Putin’s decision amid all this to ship the sophisticated S-300 air-defense system to Iran was a thunderclap event. The ever-omniscient president dismissed it as no surprise.
We assume Barack Obama and John Kerry are telling Senate Democrats that if something blows, they’ll handle it, the way Mr. Obama could command Kathleen Sebelius and HHS to “fix” the ObamaCare glitches. The Iran framework’s fix is the assurance of “snapback” sanctions, a word with no meaning whatsoever.
The Senate Democrats’ initial hedge on Iran was smart politics. As was letting New Jersey Democrat Bob Menendez run point for them. Mr. Obama’s implicit charge in January at the Senate’s Maryland retreat that their Jewish donors had too much influence should have convinced them they needed political cover from the president’s overreaching on the nuclear deal.
But now the Holder Justice Department has indicted Sen. Menendez into oblivion. And now the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and the guided missile cruiser USS Normandy are in the Gulf of Aden, cat-and-mousing with an Iranian naval flotilla.
The Democrats have no inoculation anymore. The party’s calculation that Hillary Clinton’s candidacy would bring home the presidency and Senate control after defeating vulnerable Republicans has a big fly in the goo: For the next 19 months, Iran is theirs.
Write to
Write to Daniel Henninger at

No comments:

Post a Comment