Friday, March 17, 2017

Evil Obama goes to Hawaii judge shopping for judge to make the ridiculous ruling against the travel ban.

So still think Obama is not running shadow government. Evil Obama goes to Hawaii judge shopping for judge to make the ridiculous ruling against the travel ban. Used his fellow Harvard law school buddy whom Obama appointed, to commit this crime. Won't last long. Another Harvard Law school classmate, Neil Gorsuch, when finally seated on SCOTUS, will reestablish the rule of law.
more details: Obama's radical left judges endanger us all.
Again they IGNORE the Constitution and Obama's and other president's own precedent in blocking certain nations immigrants. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled repeatedly that courts cannot look behind the "bona fide" reasons for an executive order on immigration to find constitutional violations lurking in the background.
Here is the Immigration and Nationality Act, which gives the president authority to suspend the entry of any and all aliens deemed “detrimental” to U.S. interests.
“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate,” the 1952 law states.
Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate immigration. In 1952, Congress passed a law empowering the president to deny entry into the U.S. to “any class of aliens” considered to be “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” In other words, a threat to America and in the interests of national security.
The Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that Congress and the president have “plenary power” to regulate immigration. For more than a century, the high court has consistently upheld such authority and rejected constitutional challenges to presidential action banning entire groups of foreigners. Even the 9th Circuit has endorsed this legal principle. Past presidents, including Carter and Obama, have issued orders similar to Trump’s.
It is true that a subsequent 1965 immigration law prohibits discrimination based on race, sex, nationality, place of birth or place of residence. But that law says nothing about religion. And, more importantly, it applies only to the issuance of visas. The president’s authority to deny entry to a large class of aliens is a broader power which supersedes individual visa considerations.

No comments:

Post a Comment