Why she belongs in jail and Legal experts who say hillary committed crimes

Any OBJECTIVE person understands

The ONLY reason Hillary is NOT in jail is because they Obama/Clinton Dem corruption have corrupted FBI and Dept. Of Justice.

-She repeated a dozen different lies about the emails http://www.nationalreview.com/article/437606/hillary-clintons-eight-email-lies-exposed-james-comey including FBI findings that she was grossly negligent and reckless with our top secrets

-Unprotected illegal personal server with classified documents

-Claims did not know what classification marking are after 46 years in government http://nypost.com/2016/09/02/fbi-releases-documents-on-clinton-email-investigation/

-deleted 33,000 emails after Federal subpoena

-bleach bitted emails

-claimed 33,000 were personal but many discovered work related

had phones destroyed by hammers

-FBI handing out immunity like candy

-Bill has meeting with Dept of Justice Secretary lynch day before her subordinate at FBI announces to charges http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/29/politics/bill-clinton-loretta-lynch/

-FBI Director has business conflict of interest with Clinton Foundation http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/09/10/exposed-fbi-director-james-comeys-clinton-foundation-connection/

-Obama announced no crime here before FBI finished investigation

-dozens of lawyers say more than 20 crimes committed by Hillaryhttp://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2016/10/legal-experts-who-say-hillary-committed.html

One law for hillary, one for everyone else.

Degenerate, despicable, Democrats. Her media lapdogs trying to defend her gross corruption.

Clinton may have, in fact, committed a crime.

#1 Fox’s Judge Andrew Napolitano has said time and time again that there is ‘overwhelming’ evidence to both indict and convict Clinton.  “The evidence is overwhelming to conclude, overwhelming to anyone that observed what she did,” he said.

# 2 Former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey penned a  Wall Street Journal opinion piece saying that a criminal charge is, in fact, justified. He writes:

“…from her direction that classification rules be disregarded, to the presence on her personal email server of information at the highest level of classification, to her repeated falsehoods of a sort that juries are told every day may be treated as evidence of guilty knowledge—it is nearly impossible to draw any conclusion other than that she knew enough to support a conviction at the least for mishandling classified information.”

# 3 LawNewz.com editor Chris White who says “At a minimum, we know enough today to sustain a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material.”

#4 Former Asst. U.S. District Attorney Andrew McCarthy also believes she may have committed a crime he wrote in The New York Times:

These attempts to suggest she was unaware of any wrongdoing are likely unavailing. .. The laws against mishandling classified information are prosecution-friendly. For example, it is a felony for one entrusted with classified information not only to communicate it to a person unauthorized to have it, but also to enable its removal from its secure storage facility through gross negligence. It is also a crime to fail to report that information’s improper removal or communication. So is retaining materials containing classified information at an unauthorized location… Secretary Clinton systematically conducted official business on a private unsecure system, and had subordinates do likewise, knowing the nature of their duties made classified communications inevitable