Guns: liberals gun control plan has led to 56 million dead in 20th century

Our main gun problem is a direct reflection of horrible Democratic policies on 1. welfare that destroyed Black families, incentivezed men to abandon their families leading to massive teen boys joining violent gangs and shooting each other in our inner cities (Racist news media does not care because they are black) and 
2. popularizing gun free zones so one can defend the innocent when a crazy person starts shooting. These problem massively dwarfs any shootings by crazy people shooting. Trying to take away guns from law abiding citizens will FAIL, just as making drugs illegal has failed, and prohibition failed. Even if successful, then only criminals will have guns and we will be worse off. The world's worst tyrants who killed a hundred million in the 20th century (Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot) tok away guns and the population could not defend themselves

GUNS How about focusing on the real danger. Isis plans to kill hundreds of millions. Obama created them through horrible policies. Obama will gave Iran $150 billion and let them self-inspect their nuclear sites as they chant “death to America”. The real problem is our jihadist president and the liberal supporters. Here are 217 examples http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/09/180-examples-that-obama-is-radical-pro.html

And Obama ratcheting up racial tension http://100percentfedup.com/video-louis-farrakhan-threatens-the-cia-and-fbi-in-heated-exchange-about-his-call-for-10000-black-men-to-kill-whitey/

On guns:

1. How do you stop murderers with guns if you have no guns? (1)

2. We protect all our President and Pope with guns? Would liberals remove these guns too? (2)

3. The cities with strictest gun control have highest levels of murderers. (3)

4. Historically it is tyrants who want catastrophic control of the population who succeed in gun control. Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated

in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million. (4)

5. We have thousands of gun laws on the books (5) How about enforcing them?

6. The US Constitution guarantees the right to bear arms. (6)

7. Outlawing guns won't work. Only criminals would have them. Example, prohibition, drugs now (7)

8. The more guns, the less violent crime (8)

9.. Less guns do not = less suicide

10 teen blacks shooting blacks account for 55% of gun violence. Destruction of the black family is the issue and that was caused by idiotic Democratic welfare programs.
11. Israel has had no classroom shootings since 1974 when they started arming teachers.

http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/10/guns-liberals-gun-control-plan-has-led.html

NOTES on above points
1. Pope says no one who invests in weapons company can be a Christian. Ok , tell your ARMED guards to put away their guns. + How do you propose to stop the slaughter of Christians without weapons? How about your contradicting yourself in three sentences about stopping the Holocaust?

(John Hinderaker) Powerline blog “Pope Francis is rapidly convincing me that he is not just a leftist, but a dope. Speaking to a group of young people in Turin, he departed from his script and launched into a rambling denunciation of, among others, arms manufacturers. He also criticized those who invest in weapons industries. Then he said “The great powers had the pictures of the railway lines that brought the trains to the concentration camps like Auschwitz to kill Jews, Christians, homosexuals, everybody. Why didn’t they bomb (the railway lines)?”

With what? Oh yeah, that would be bombs. Dropped out of bombers. Manufactured by…whom? Pope Francis needs to pull out of his recent tailspin before he becomes an international laughingstock.
3. USA ranks 111th country in murders per capita

The gun grabbers hate this truth. Let Obama be a good example have his security details give up their arms as an experiment. Hitler and Stalin also wanted strict gun control. Chicago has nation's strictest gun control and that number from Oregon shooting get killed black on black crime every weekend and no one says a thing. Gun control advocates are endangering everyone in this nation. That school was a gunfree zone so no one was able to stop him until the police got there. Typical liberal idiocy

4. 

In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control.
From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up
and exterminated.

In 1911, Turkey established gun control.
From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.

Germany established gun control in 1938 and
from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and
others who were unable to defend themselves were
rounded up and exterminated.

China established gun control in 1935.
From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up
and exterminated.

Guatemala established gun control in 1964.
From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.

Uganda established gun control in 1970.
From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded
up and exterminated.

Cambodia established gun control in 1956.
From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people,
unable to defend themselves, were rounded up
and exterminated.

Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated
in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.6.According to the syllabus prepared by the U.S. Supreme Court Reporter of Decisions,^[179] in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Supreme Court held:^[179][180] The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.^[179][180]

(a) The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.^[179][180]

(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court’s interpretation of the operative clause. The “militia” comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens’ militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens’ militia would be preserved. Pp. 22–28.^[179][180]

(c) The Court’s interpretation is confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately followed the Second Amendment. Pp. 28–30.^[179][180]

(d) The Second Amendment’s drafting history, while of dubious interpretive worth, reveals three state Second Amendment proposals that unequivocally referred to an individual right to bear arms. Pp. 30–32.^[179][180]

(e) Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts and legislators, from immediately after its ratification through the late 19th century also supports the Court’s conclusion. Pp. 32–47.^[179][180]

(f) None of the Court’s precedents forecloses the Court’s interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252, refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes. Pp. 47–54.^[179][180]

 Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller‍ '​s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those "in common use at the time" finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54–56.^[179][180]

8.http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/01/28/fbi-report-more-guns-correlated-with-less-crime-in-first-half-of-2014/
9. Japan, for instance, has among the world’s most-restrictive gun-control regimes — and yet also has among the world’s highest suicide rates, almost double the U.S. suicide rate.
10.  blacks were 55% of shooting homicide victims in 2010, but 13% of the population.