The biggest lies being spread:
Islam is a peaceful religion.
Obama says 99.9% of Muslims want what we want
Jews never had a Temple on the Temple Mount
Jews are interlopers in Israel
There are Palestinian moderates in leadership who would make peace with Israel if Israel was serious
Obama wants to help the American economy
Obama is fighting Isis
Attacks on Obama are based in racism
Attacks on Hillary are a right wing conspiracy
SEE
see http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/10/palestinian-moderates-demand-more-dead
Why Islam=Violence today
While all Abrahamic faiths have violence in their histories,
only Islam is responsible for 90% of the terrorism and so much of the world’s
violence today. Why? The violent commands of God in the Hebrew
scriptures were specific to that time and place and the sages later interpreted
the text to curb the violence. The Quran on the other hand, as it commands death
to the infidels, places no historical limit, so are read by Muslims to be the
will of Allah for all time+ and accompany the exploits to Mohammaed mass
murdering and conquering those who would not convert. This will make a peaceful Reform of Islam extremely
difficult..
Islam=Violence
Jews
are killed every day this week getting killed and attacked by barbarian Muslims who are citizens of Israel
and the world is silent, while the New York Times blames the Jews. Now it is
spreading to the streets of the world. Muslims
everywhere rape, murder, demand shariah, take welfare benefits, slit throats,
cut off heads, and do nothing as Egypt’s president says they must reform. Isis is
expanding wildly and looking to buy nuclear material to kill hundreds of millions
(so says a journalist who went undercover), and our jihadist President
undercuts Israel repeatedly as he aids and abets Iran’s genocidal cries of “death
to America, death to Israel.” The real problem is our jihadist president and the
liberal supporters. Here are 217 examples http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/09/180-examples-that-obama-is-radical-pro.html
Majority of Palestinians just want all of
Israel and Jews dead and they have ZERO claim to anything. They are are in war
criminals, celebrate murder of civilians, want to kill all Jews and steal
Jewish land
|
Surces:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/shocking-new-study-reveals-just-how-many-muslims-support-isis-and-its-frightening/ and http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/09/isis-wants-to-kill-hundreds-of-millions.html
Eat
their wives: http://speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.1138/new-fatwa-muslims-may-eat-their-wives.html
EAT
JEWS AND CHRISTIANS In the book “Persuasion in Resolving the Words of Abi
Shoga” that takes after the Shafi school of jurisprudence, the author says a
Muslim warrior may kill and eat infidel men, women and children if they were
not warriors themselves. But not pigs.
Some
Islamic Imams sanctions PEDIOPHILIA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5t9U9r9Kfs
Some Muslims throw
gays off the roof but raping little boys is a well-accepted practice among many
http://freebeacon.com/national-security/congressmen-introduce-resolution-to-reinstate-war-hero-who-blew-whistle-on-afghan-rape/
1/3 USA Muslims
support violent jihad https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2015/06/23/nationwide-poll-of-us-muslims-shows-thousands-support-shariah-jihad/
Don’t let the BDS student terrorists fool you.
Palestinians are barbarians, violent terrorist jhadists with no claim to
Israel’s land. http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/09/20-lines-of-analysis-showing.html
How can anyone but a jihadist think they should have another terrorist nation?
Hillary is a VERY DANGEROUS, unethical, lying, radicalized, pro Islamic radicals, long history ANTI-Israel views except when she wants money and votes, untrustworthy PERSON. Voting for Hillary is a sexist act. Can’t be for any valid reason. http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/07/hillary-is-very-dangerous-person-voting.html
Obama told us he was going
radically transform America. That was THE HOPE & CHANGE. How
Obama and Democrats’s radicalism and pro-Islamic jihadism is destroying the
world http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/03/obama-told-us-he-was-going-radically.html
ISLAM
Obama/the left’s BIGGEST/MOST DANGEROUS
LIE? Islam is a peaceful religion. Next time someone idiot tells you that you
are Islamiphobic or that Islam is peaceful, ask them what percent of
Muslims support ISIS. Answer 81% by Arab poll. http://www.commdiginews.com/featured/al-jazeera-poll-suggests-81-of-arab-muslims-support-isis-42253/
1. A phobia, by definition, must be irrational. Fearing Islam is very rational.
2. Muslims have been EVIL since their origin. child abuse, sexual slavery, mass murder, bestiality, anti gay, anti women. NOT ALL. But many. Toll of dead? 590 million
3. Huge # America Muslims support Shariah to replace the Constitution
4. This includes terrorist Muslims who call themselves Palestine
http://strongandresolute.blogspot.com/2015/04/no-to-terrorist-arab-palestine-and-no.html
Richard Baehr on the effort to say both Israel and Abbas are equally responsible for the violence? Does the PA have a strategy?
Richard Baehr on the effort to say both Israel and Abbas are equally responsible for the violence? Does the PA have a strategy?
A
third intifada has not yet been officially designated by Haaretz or The
New York Times or National Public Radio, though it may feel as if one
is underway, when over 60% of Israelis in the latest public opinion
survey say they now fear for their personal safety. So too, there is no
evidence yet that the wave of Palestinian attacks or -- new to this
current campaign -- the attempted mass crossings from Gaza, have
peaked.
Certainly,
the reporting on the current events in Israel reflects old habits about
how most journalists cover stories of Palestinian violence and Israeli
responses. Two standbys always work. One is that there is "a cycle of
violence" ( a pox on both your houses), always leaving unclear who the
original perpetrators were in an individual attack or group of attacks.
A second is to keep a daily scorecard of the comparative body counts,
especially when there are more Palestinian casualties and fatalities
than Israeli, courtesy of Israeli police or soldiers responding to
stabbing attacks, not all of which prove lethal before the attacker is
neutralized. This narrative leads to the inevitable charge of
disproportionality, one that has become the principal media assault on
Israeli responses to terror emanating from Gaza in recent years. As in
every other instance in recent years, Haaretz is
playing its appointed role of feeding the many international
journalists in the country with the "truth in English" as it sees it,
and as the international media want to receive and see it, confirming
all their established biases about Israel behavior.
For
Israeli responses to the current violence to be "fair" and
proportional, the comparative Jewish and Arab body counts would need to
be more in balance than in prior years. When the current campaign of
attacks on Israelis began, The New York Times relegated the story to it
its interior pages. Once a few Palestinians were killed by Israeli
police, the story became front page news.
Any
attack on Arabs by an Israeli is always highlighted since it removes
any attempt by Israel to argue it is the victim of attacks. It also
buttresses the PA's charges that
Israelis, whether in security roles or settlers, are willing
executioners, committing crimes against Palestinians. Regardless of how
infrequent these individual attacks by Israelis are, they serve to
solidify the cycle of violence theme. The Israeli government can
condemn these attacks and capture the perpetrators, but it makes no
difference. The PA, meanwhile, will applaud the heroism of their new
martyrs protecting the holy places on the Temple Mount from an invasion
of stinking Jewish filth.
The
current wave of Arab attacks followed a Palestinian Authority
incitement campaign with language such as that above, in which
President Mahmoud Abbas, seemingly the president for life, though only
elected to a four year term, condemned Israel's campaign to change the
status of the Temple Mount, for which there is no evidence whatsoever.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, probably in seclusion and being
treated with antidepressants since being denied the Nobel Peace Prize
for his abject surrender to the Iranians in Geneva, has acknowledged to
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the Americans understand
there is no Israeli effort underway to reshape any policy regarding
behavior on the Temple Mount. Kerry can probably blame Yasser Arafat's
Nobel Peace Prize for the peace prize medal he did not receive (and
likely would not have tossed away). The selection committee was
probably not anxious to have the Iranians make them look like fools in
years to come once they violated the nuclear deal as Arafat tossed Oslo
aside when it was inconvenient.
The
naked demagoguery of Abbas' continually repeated lies about Israeli
plans for the Temple Mount will always have the desired affect on the
many young men on whom the PA can depend to take to the streets and do
their part to protect the "holy places" for a fee. While there is no
consensus on the degree of PA control over the attacks, the
Palestinians certainly know where their rhetoric leads.
The
question, though, is why the Palestinians have chosen this point in
time to overheat the situation, resulting in the loss of both Israeli
and Palestinian lives.
The
answer offered by most analysts so far is that the PA wanted to draw
international attention back to its grievances with Israel, which most
basically begins with the continued existence of the State of Israel.
For many months, relations between Israel and the United States, never
very good at any time during the Obama years, have become much more
fractious as a result of the disagreement between the two countries
over the wisdom of America's spearheading the effort to make all the
concessions required as achieve the nuclear deal with Iran by the P5+1
group of nations.
In
prior administrations, when relations between the two countries hit a
rough patch over some policy disagreement, typically there was an
effort made by both parties to try to restore the historic
relationship. In the Obama years, the White House has had problems with
Israel on pretty much everything -- whether to impose new sanctions on
Iran, inhibiting Israeli steps targeting Iran's nuclear program, the
nuclear deal itself, and of course the peace process with the
Palestinians, the breakdown of which was blamed on Israel by the
administration. In no prior administration has the public rhetoric and
off-the-record commentary about Israel and its elected leader been so
consistently hostile. A boycott of Netanyahu's speech to a joint meeting
of Congress was supported by the administration, which pulled Vice
President Joe Biden from attendance. Near a quarter of all Democrats in
Congress chose to observe the boycott. The administration doubled down
on its boycott campaign when Kerry and Ambassador Samantha Power were
instructed not to attend Netanyahu's recent speech to the U.N. General
Assembly. It makes sense that the president has never condemned the
Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaigns targeting Israel on American
college campuses. He would probably be leading them if he were now a
student.
In
any case, Abbas may sense that a reconciliation between Israel and the
Obama administration is not at hand this time around. The obvious and
petty boycott of Netanyahu's speech at the U.N. certainly supports that
thesis. This president carries grudges. In Israel's case, he seems to
have come into office carrying one. With the president in full-time
legacy-building mode in his last 16 months in office (the climate
treaty and executive action on gun control are next up), it is hard to
believe that he will simply accept defeat and an inability to influence
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in the time he has left.
Abbas
has resorted to the strategy that always works to get his cause back in
the news -- get some of his people killed by Israel, and blame it on
Israeli over-reaction and trigger-happy behavior. Maybe Obama will then
show his disgust with Israel and commit to not vetoing new measures
targeting Israel at the U.N. Security Council, including establishing a
plan for Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank and Jerusalem.
It
is also possible that Obama planned to lower the temperature of the
American-Israeli relationship now that the Iran deal had not been
blocked by Congress. The prime minister had been invited to the White
House next month, and reportedly the president planned to show up. If
Abbas thought this was the new glide path, then throwing a monkey
wrench into the mix with new violence would certainly complicate
things. Obama's press secretary, Josh Earnest, gave a particularly awful response when questioned about the new wave of Palestinian violence this week, suggesting he had not been advised to turn any page:
"The
United States condemns in the strongest possible terms violence
against Israeli and Palestinian civilians. We call upon all parties to
take affirmative steps to restore calm and refrain from actions and
rhetoric that would further enflame tensions in that region of the
world. We continue to urge all sides to find a way back to the full
restoration of the status quo at the Temple Mount in Haram al-Sharif,
the location that has precipitated so much of the violence that we've
seen there."
In
other words, both sides are guilty for attacking the other's
civilians, and somehow a change in the status of the Temple Mount
(Israel's doing) was the root cause of the new problems.
When
the administration's top spokesperson makes this kind of comment, do
you think Abbas will decide to ease up on the violence accelerator?
No comments:
Post a Comment