Saturday, April 18, 2015

This is the answer on Iran we need from a President, not Obama's or Hillary's
Iran on Saturday marked Army Day with a military parade featuring new weapons systems, as well as a truck carrying a massive banner reading “Death to Israel.”A televised broadcast of the parade was punctuated by repeated cries of “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.

Last night, during the New Hampshire GOP’s First in the Nation Leadership Summit in Nashua, Marco Rubio took questions from the audience about a handful of critical issues, including the Obama Administration’s handling of Iran.
Here’s a look at his response, via
“We may have to decide at some point what is worse: a military strike against Iran or a nuclear-armed Iran,” Rubio said during a question-and-answer session. “I am not cheerleading for war. I don’t want there to be the need to use military force, but a nuclear Iran is an unacceptable risk for the region and the world.”
But what about the inspection protocol in the current deal?
“We’re trusting that if we want to inspect, they will let us,” he said. “We’ve seen this movie before; it was called Iraq. We would say, ‘Listen, we want to go in and inspect.’ Saddam Hussein would say, ‘No, you can’t.’ And, then 90 days later, they’d finally let you in, and they had cleaned up the site. You went back 90 days later, and it would be the same game again.
“Iran is the premier sponsor of terrorism on the planet,” he went on. “They use terrorism the way normal nations use diplomacy.”

Hillary: Hillary Clinton Backs Obama On Iran Agreem...
Apr 2, 2015 ... Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issued a statement in support of the framework for a nuclear agreement with Iran on Thursday evening 


No comments:

Post a Comment